ECCC-Report TR24-016https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2024/016Comments and Revisions published for TR24-016en-usSun, 28 Jan 2024 11:19:23 +0200
Paper TR24-016
| Randomized query composition and product distributions |
Swagato Sanyal
https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2024/016Let R_eps denote randomized query complexity for error probability eps, and R:=R_{1/3}. In this work we investigate whether a perfect composition theorem R(f o g^n)=Omega(R(f).R(g)) holds for a relation f in {0,1}^n * S and a total inner function g:{0,1}^m \to {0, 1}.
Let D^(prod) denote the maximum distributional query complexity with respect to any product (over variables) distribution. In this work we show the composition theorem R(f o g^n)=Omega(R(f).D^{prod}(g)) up to logarithmic factors. In light of the minimax theorem which states that R(g) is the maximum distributional complexity of g over any distribution, our result makes progress towards answering the composition question. We prove our result by means of a complexity measure R^(prod)_(eps) that we define for total Boolean functions. We show it to be equivalent (up to logarithmic factors) to the sabotage complexity measure RS() defined by Ben-David and Kothari (ICALP 2019): RS(g) = Theta(R^(prod)_(1/3)(g)) (up to log factors).
We ask if our bound RS(g) = Omega(D^(prod)(g)) (up to log factors) is tight. We answer this question in the negative, by showing that for the NAND tree function, sabotage complexity is polynomially larger than D^(prod). Our proof yields an alternative and different derivation of the tight lower bound on the bounded error randomized query complexity of the NAND tree function (originally proved by Santha in 1985), which may be of independent interest. Our result gives an explicit polynomial separation between R and D^(prod) which, to our knowledge, was not known prior to our work.Sun, 28 Jan 2024 11:19:23 +0200https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2024/016