Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > DETAIL:

Revision(s):

Revision #1 to TR26-174 | 14th September 2026 20:18

Frustration Free Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian with Sub-Constant Gap is in $\NP$

RSS-Feed




Revision #1
Authors: Eshan Chattopadhyay, Oren Renard, Nicholas Spooner
Accepted on: 14th September 2026 20:18
Downloads: 132
Keywords: 


Abstract:

We continue the study of the Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian problem, a physically motivated restriction of the QMA-complete Local Hamiltonian problem. For the $\beta$-gapped, frustration-free case, Bravyi, Bessen and Terhal showed that the problem is MA-complete when $\beta= \frac{1}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$. Aharonov And Grilo derandomized this algorithm, showing membership in NP for constant gap $\beta = \Omega(1)$.

We present an improved algorithm and analysis, establishing membership in NP even when $\beta = \Omega (\frac{1}{\log\log n})$.
We complement our result with an explicit example demonstrating why the analysis does not extend directly to $\beta = o(1/\log\log n)$.



Changes to previous version:

Updated abstract.


Paper:

TR26-174 | 11th September 2026 14:25

Frustration Free Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian with Sub-Constant Gap is in $\NP$





TR26-174
Authors: Eshan Chattopadhyay, Oren Renard, Nicholas Spooner
Publication: 13th September 2026 15:19
Downloads: 241
Keywords: 


Abstract:

We continue the study of the Stoquastic Local Hamiltonian problem, a physically motivated restriction of the $\QMA$-complete Local Hamiltonian problem \cite{KSV02}. For the $\beta$-gapped, frustration-free case, \citet{BBT06} showed that the problem is $\MA$-complete when $\beta= \frac{1}{\poly(n)}$. \citet{AG19} derandomized this algorithm and proved membership in $\NP$ for constant gap $\beta = \Omega(1)$.

An improved algorithm and analysis of \cite{AG19} are presented, establishing membership in $\NP$ even when $\beta = \Omega (\frac{1}{\log\log n})$.
We complement our result with an explicit example demonstrating why the analysis does not extend directly to $\beta = o(1/\log\log n)$.



ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint