Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > KEYWORD > HARDNESS VERSUS RANDOMNESS:
Reports tagged with hardness versus randomness:
TR00-009 | 21st February 2000
Russell Impagliazzo, Ronen Shaltiel, Avi Wigderson

Extractors and pseudo-random generators with optimal seed length

We give the first construction of a pseudo-random generator with
optimal seed length that uses (essentially) arbitrary hardness.
It builds on the novel recursive use of the NW-generator in
a previous paper by the same authors, which produced many optimal
generators one of which was pseudo-random. This is achieved ... more >>>


TR18-085 | 26th April 2018
Andrej Bogdanov, Manuel Sabin, Prashant Nalini Vasudevan

XOR Codes and Sparse Random Linear Equations with Noise

A $k$-LIN instance is a system of $m$ equations over $n$ variables of the form $s_{i[1]} + \dots + s_{i[k]} =$ 0 or 1 modulo 2 (each involving $k$ variables). We consider two distributions on instances in which the variables are chosen independently and uniformly but the right-hand sides are ... more >>>


TR18-092 | 4th May 2018
Marco Carmosino, Russell Impagliazzo, Manuel Sabin

Fine-Grained Derandomization: From Problem-Centric to Resource-Centric Complexity

We show that popular hardness conjectures about problems from the field of fine-grained complexity theory imply structural results for resource-based complexity classes. Namely, we show that if either k-Orthogonal Vectors or k-CLIQUE requires $n^{\epsilon k}$ time, for some constant $\epsilon > 1/2$, to count (note that these conjectures are significantly ... more >>>


TR19-037 | 5th March 2019
Chi-Ning Chou, Mrinal Kumar, Noam Solomon

Closure of VP under taking factors: a short and simple proof

Revisions: 1

In this note, we give a short, simple and almost completely self contained proof of a classical result of Kaltofen [Kal86, Kal87, Kal89] which shows that if an n variate degree $d$ polynomial f can be computed by an arithmetic circuit of size s, then each of its factors can ... more >>>


TR20-081 | 21st May 2020
Robert Andrews

Algebraic Hardness versus Randomness in Low Characteristic

We show that lower bounds for explicit constant-variate polynomials over fields of characteristic $p > 0$ are sufficient to derandomize polynomial identity testing over fields of characteristic $p$. In this setting, existing work on hardness-randomness tradeoffs for polynomial identity testing requires either the characteristic to be sufficiently large or the ... more >>>


TR20-148 | 28th September 2020
Lijie Chen, Roei Tell

Simple and fast derandomization from very hard functions: Eliminating randomness at almost no cost

Revisions: 1

Extending the classical ``hardness-to-randomness'' line-of-works, Doron et al. (FOCS 2020) recently proved that derandomization with near-quadratic time overhead is possible, under the assumption that there exists a function in $\mathcal{DTIME}[2^n]$ that cannot be computed by randomized SVN circuits of size $2^{(1-\epsilon)\cdot n}$ for a small $\epsilon$.

In this work we ... more >>>


TR26-045 | 30th March 2026
Edward Pyne, Roei Tell

Using Hardness vs Randomness to Design Low-Space Algorithms

Can we use ``hardness vs randomness'' techniques to design low-space algorithms? This text surveys a sequence of recent works showing ways to do that.
These works designed algorithms for certified derandomization and for catalytic computation (which work unconditionally), derandomization and isolation algorithms from remarkably mild assumptions, and ``win-win'' pairs ... more >>>




ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint