Loading jsMath...
Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > KEYWORD > CIRCUIT DEPTH:
Reports tagged with circuit depth:
TR11-150 | 4th November 2011
Anna Gal, Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Michal Koucky, Pavel Pudlak, Emanuele Viola

Tight bounds on computing error-correcting codes by bounded-depth circuits with arbitrary gates

We bound the minimum number w of wires needed to compute any (asymptotically good) error-correcting code
C:\{0,1\}^{\Omega(n)} \to \{0,1\}^n with minimum distance \Omega(n),
using unbounded fan-in circuits of depth d with arbitrary gates. Our main results are:

(1) If d=2 then w = \Theta(n ({\log n/ \log \log n})^2).

(2) ... more >>>


TR13-093 | 21st June 2013
Anna Gal, Jing-Tang Jang

A Generalization of Spira's Theorem and Circuits with Small Segregators or Separators

Spira showed that any Boolean formula of size s can be simulated in depth O(\log s). We generalize Spira's theorem and show that any Boolean circuit of size s with segregators of size f(s) can be simulated in depth O(f(s)\log s). If the segregator size is at least s^{\varepsilon} for ... more >>>


TR14-124 | 7th October 2014
Periklis Papakonstantinou

The Depth Irreducibility Hypothesis

We propose the following computational assumption: in general if we try to compress the depth of a circuit family (parallel time) more than a constant factor we will suffer super-quasi-polynomial blowup in the size (number of processors). This assumption is only slightly stronger than the popular assumption about the robustness ... more >>>


TR18-184 | 5th November 2018
Iddo Tzameret, Stephen Cook

Uniform, Integral and Feasible Proofs for the Determinant Identities

Revisions: 1

Aiming to provide weak as possible axiomatic assumptions in which one can develop basic linear algebra, we give a uniform and integral version of the short propositional proofs for the determinant identities demonstrated over GF(2) in Hrubes-Tzameret [SICOMP'15]. Specifically, we show that the multiplicativity of the determinant function and the ... more >>>


TR18-192 | 12th November 2018
Alexander Golovnev, Alexander Kulikov

Circuit Depth Reductions

Revisions: 3

The best known circuit lower bounds against unrestricted circuits remained around 3n for several decades. Moreover, the only known technique for proving lower bounds in this model, gate elimination, is inherently limited to proving lower bounds of less than 5n. In this work, we suggest a first non-gate-elimination approach for ... more >>>


TR19-120 | 11th September 2019
Or Meir

Toward Better Depth Lower Bounds: Two Results on the Multiplexor Relation

Revisions: 2

One of the major open problems in complexity theory is proving super-logarithmic
lower bounds on the depth of circuits (i.e., \mathbf{P}\not\subseteq\mathbf{NC}^1). Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson (Computational Complexity 5, 3/4) suggested to approach this problem by proving that depth complexity behaves "as expected" with respect to the composition of functions $f ... more >>>




ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint