Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



LATEST > REPORTS:
RSS-Feedprevious PreviousNext next

TR08-053 | 27th March 2008
Stephen A. Fenner, William Gasarch, Brian Postow

The complexity of learning SUBSEQ(A)

Higman showed that if A is *any* language then SUBSEQ(A)
is regular, where SUBSEQ(A) is the language of all
subsequences of strings in A. (The result we attribute
to Higman is actually an easy consequence of his work.)
Let s_1, s_2, s_3, ... more >>>


TR08-052 | 29th April 2008
Vikraman Arvind, T.C. Vijayaraghavan

The Orbit problem is in the GapL Hierarchy

Revisions: 1

The \emph{Orbit problem} is defined as follows: Given a matrix $A\in
\Q ^{n\times n}$ and vectors $\x,\y\in \Q ^n$, does there exist a
non-negative integer $i$ such that $A^i\x=\y$. This problem was
shown to be in deterministic polynomial time by Kannan and Lipton in
\cite{KL1986}. In this paper we place ... more >>>


TR08-051 | 4th April 2008
Scott Aaronson, Salman Beigi, Andrew Drucker, Bill Fefferman, Peter Shor

The Power of Unentanglement

The class QMA(k), introduced by Kobayashi et al., consists
of all languages that can be verified using k unentangled quantum
proofs. Many of the simplest questions about this class have remained
embarrassingly open: for example, can we give any evidence that k
quantum proofs are more powerful than one? Can ... more >>>



previous PreviousNext next


ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint