We show that the total space in resolution, as well as in any other reasonable
proof system, is equal (up to a polynomial and $(\log n)^{O(1)}$ factors) to
the minimum refutation depth. In particular, all these variants of total space
are equivalent in this sense. The same conclusion holds for variable
space as long as we penalize for excessively (that is, super-exponential) long
proofs, which makes the question about equivalence of variable space and depth
about the same as the question of (non)-existence of ``supercritical''
tradeoffs
between the variable space and the proof length. We provide a partial negative
answer to this question: for all $s(n)\leq n^{1/2}$ there exist CNF
contradictions $\tau_n$ that possess refutations with variable space $s(n)$
but such that every refutation of $\tau_n$ with variable space $o(s^2)$ must
have double exponential length $2^{2^{\Omega(s)}}$. We also include a much
weaker tradeoff result between variable space and depth in the opposite range
$s(n)\ll \log n$ and show that no supercritical tradeoff is possible in this
range.