Revision #2 Authors: Oded Goldreich, Guy Rothblum, Tal Skverer

Accepted on: 12th September 2022 19:39

Downloads: 22

Keywords:

Interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) offer ultra-fast

approximate verification of assertions regarding their input,

where ultra-fast means that only a small portion of the input is read

and approximate verification is analogous to the notion of

approximate decision that underlies property testing.

Specifically, in an IPP, the prover can make the verifier

accept each input in the property, but cannot fool the verifier

into accepting an input that is far from the property

(except for with small probability).

The verifier in an IPP system engages in two very different types

of activities: interacting with an untrusted prover, and querying its input.

The definition allows for arbitrary coordination between these two activities,

but keeping them separate is both conceptually interesting

and necessary for important applications

such as addressing temporal considerations

(i.e., at what time is each of the services available)

and facilitating the construction of zero-knowledge schemes.

In this work we embark on a systematic study of IPPs

with proof-oblivious queries, where the queries should not be affected

by the interaction with the prover.

We assign the query and interaction activities to separate modules,

and consider different limitations on their coordination.

The most strict limitation requires these activities to

be totally isolated from one another; they just feed

their views to a separate deciding module.

We show that such systems can be efficiently emulated by standard testers.

Going to the other extreme, we only disallow information

to flow from the interacting module to the querying module,

but allow free information flow in the other direction.

We show that extremely efficient one-round (i.e., two-message) systems

of such type can be used to verify properties that are extremely

hard to test (without the help of a prover).

That is, the complexity of verifying can be polylogarithmic in the complexity of testing.

This stands in contrast the MAPs (viewed as $1/2$-round systems)

in which proof-oblivious queries are as limited as our isolated model.

Our focus is on an intermediate model that allows

shared randomness among the querying and interacting modules

but no information flow between them.

In this case we show

that 1-round systems are efficiently emulated by standard testers

but $3/2$-round systems of extremely low complexity

exist for properties that are extremely hard to test.

One additional result about this model is that it can

efficiently emulate any IPP for any property of low-degree polynomials.

Correcting Guy's affiliation.

Revision #1 Authors: Oded Goldreich, Guy Rothblum, Tal Skverer

Accepted on: 9th September 2022 11:39

Downloads: 54

Keywords:

Interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) offer ultra-fast

approximate verification of assertions regarding their input,

where ultra-fast means that only a small portion of the input is read

and approximate verification is analogous to the notion of

approximate decision that underlies property testing.

Specifically, in an IPP, the prover can make the verifier

accept each input in the property, but cannot fool the verifier

into accepting an input that is far from the property

(except for with small probability).

The verifier in an IPP system engages in two very different types

of activities: interacting with an untrusted prover, and querying its input.

The definition allows for arbitrary coordination between these two activities,

but keeping them separate is both conceptually interesting

and necessary for important applications

such as addressing temporal considerations

(i.e., at what time is each of the services available)

and facilitating the construction of zero-knowledge schemes.

In this work we embark on a systematic study of IPPs

with proof-oblivious queries, where the queries should not be affected

by the interaction with the prover.

We assign the query and interaction activities to separate modules,

and consider different limitations on their coordination.

The most strict limitation requires these activities to

be totally isolated from one another; they just feed

their views to a separate deciding module.

We show that such systems can be efficiently emulated by standard testers.

Going to the other extreme, we only disallow information

to flow from the interacting module to the querying module,

but allow free information flow in the other direction.

We show that extremely efficient one-round (i.e., two-message) systems

of such type can be used to verify properties that are extremely

hard to test (without the help of a prover).

That is, the complexity of verifying can be polylogarithmic in the complexity of testing.

This stands in contrast the MAPs (viewed as $1/2$-round systems)

in which proof-oblivious queries are as limited as our isolated model.

Our focus is on an intermediate model that allows

shared randomness among the querying and interacting modules

but no information flow between them.

In this case we show

that 1-round systems are efficiently emulated by standard testers

but $3/2$-round systems of extremely low complexity

exist for properties that are extremely hard to test.

One additional result about this model is that it can

efficiently emulate any IPP for any property of low-degree polynomials.

No change. The name of the third author was omitted from the record, and added now. Hopefully it will work.

TR22-124 Authors: Oded Goldreich, Guy Rothblum, Tal Skverer

Publication: 9th September 2022 11:31

Downloads: 24

Keywords:

Interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) offer ultra-fast

approximate verification of assertions regarding their input,

where ultra-fast means that only a small portion of the input is read

and approximate verification is analogous to the notion of

approximate decision that underlies property testing.

Specifically, in an IPP, the prover can make the verifier

accept each input in the property, but cannot fool the verifier

into accepting an input that is far from the property

(except for with small probability).

The verifier in an IPP system engages in two very different types

of activities: interacting with an untrusted prover, and querying its input.

The definition allows for arbitrary coordination between these two activities,

but keeping them separate is both conceptually interesting

and necessary for important applications

such as addressing temporal considerations

(i.e., at what time is each of the services available)

and facilitating the construction of zero-knowledge schemes.

In this work we embark on a systematic study of IPPs

with proof-oblivious queries, where the queries should not be affected

by the interaction with the prover.

We assign the query and interaction activities to separate modules,

and consider different limitations on their coordination.

The most strict limitation requires these activities to

be totally isolated from one another; they just feed

their views to a separate deciding module.

We show that such systems can be efficiently emulated by standard testers.

Going to the other extreme, we only disallow information

to flow from the interacting module to the querying module,

but allow free information flow in the other direction.

We show that extremely efficient one-round (i.e., two-message) systems

of such type can be used to verify properties that are extremely

hard to test (without the help of a prover).

That is, the complexity of verifying can be polylogarithmic in the complexity of testing.

This stands in contrast the MAPs (viewed as $1/2$-round systems)

in which proof-oblivious queries are as limited as our isolated model.

Our focus is on an intermediate model that allows

shared randomness among the querying and interacting modules

but no information flow between them.

In this case we show

that 1-round systems are efficiently emulated by standard testers

but $3/2$-round systems of extremely low complexity

exist for properties that are extremely hard to test.

One additional result about this model is that it can

efficiently emulate any IPP for any property of low-degree polynomials.