Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > KEYWORD > NON-INTERACTIVE ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS:
Reports tagged with Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proofs:
TR99-013 | 28th May 1999
Oded Goldreich, Amit Sahai, Salil Vadhan

Can Statistical Zero Knowledge be made Non-Interactive? or On the Relationship of SZK and NISZK

We extend the study of non-interactive statistical zero-knowledge
proofs. Our main focus is to compare the class NISZK of problems
possessing such non-interactive proofs to the class SZK of problems
possessing interactive statistical zero-knowledge proofs. Along these
lines, we first show that if statistical zero knowledge is non-trivial
then so ... more >>>


TR14-097 | 31st July 2014
Oded Goldreich, Liav Teichner

Super-Perfect Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Revisions: 1

We initiate a study of super-perfect zero-knowledge proof systems.
Loosely speaking, these are proof systems for which the interaction can be perfectly simulated in strict probabilistic polynomial-time.
In contrast, the standard definition of perfect zero-knowledge only requires that the interaction can be perfectly simulated
by a strict probabilistic polynomial-time that ... more >>>


TR16-140 | 9th September 2016
Adam Bouland, Lijie Chen, Dhiraj Holden, Justin Thaler, Prashant Nalini Vasudevan

On SZK and PP

Revisions: 3

In both query and communication complexity, we give separations between the class NISZK, containing those problems with non-interactive statistical zero knowledge proof systems, and the class UPP, containing those problems with randomized algorithms with unbounded error. These results significantly improve on earlier query separations of Vereschagin [Ver95] and Aaronson [Aar12] ... more >>>


TR23-213 | 31st December 2023
Riddhi Ghosal, Yuval Ishai, Alexis Korb, Eyal Kushilevitz, Paul Lou, Amit Sahai

Hard Languages in $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ and NIZK Proofs from Unstructured Hardness

The existence of "unstructured" hard languages in $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ is an intriguing open question. Bennett and Gill (SICOMP, 1981) asked whether $\text{P}$ is separated from $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ relative to a random oracle, a question that remained open ever since. While a hard language in $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ can be constructed in a black-box way ... more >>>




ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint