Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > DETAIL:

Paper:

TR09-090 | 6th October 2009 19:34

New Direct-Product Testers and 2-Query PCPs

RSS-Feed




TR09-090
Authors: Russell Impagliazzo, Valentine Kabanets, Avi Wigderson
Publication: 6th October 2009 19:36
Downloads: 1347
Keywords: 


Abstract:

The “direct product code” of a function f gives its values on all k-tuples (f(x1), . . . , f(xk)).
This basic construct underlies “hardness amplification” in cryptography, circuit complexity and
PCPs. Goldreich and Safra [GS00] pioneered its local testing and its PCP application. A recent
result by Dinur and Goldenberg [DG08] enabled for the first time testing proximity to this
important code in the “list-decoding” regime. In particular, they give a 2-query test which
works for polynomially small success probability 1/k , and show that no such test works below
success probability 1/k.
Our main result is a 3-query test which works for exponentially small success probability
exp(?k ). Our techniques (based on recent simplified decoding algorithms for the same code
[IJKW08]) also allow us to considerably simplify the analysis of the 2-query test of [DG08]. We
then show how to derandomize their test, achieving a code of polynomial rate, independent of
k, and success probability 1/k .
Finally we show the applicability of the new tests to PCPs. Starting with a 2-query PCP
over an alphabet $\Sigma$ and with soundness error $1 ? \delta$, Rao [Rao08] (building on Raz’s (k-fold)
parallel repetition theorem [Raz98] and Holenstein’s proof [Hol07]) obtains a new 2-query PCP
over the alphabet $\Sigma^k$ with soundness error $exp(?\delta^2 k)$. Our techniques yield a 2-query PCP
with soundness error $exp(?\delta \sqrt{k})$. Our PCP construction turns out to be essentially the same as
the miss-match proof system defined and analyzed by Feige and Kilian [FK00], but with simpler
analysis and exponentially better soundness error.



ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint