Weizmann Logo
ECCC
Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity

Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

Login | Register | Classic Style



REPORTS > DETAIL:

Revision(s):

Revision #1 to TR16-059 | 1st May 2016 07:47

Can PPAD Hardness be Based on Standard Cryptographic Assumptions?

RSS-Feed




Revision #1
Authors: Alon Rosen, Gil Segev, Ido Shahaf
Accepted on: 1st May 2016 07:48
Downloads: 197
Keywords: 


Abstract:

We consider the question of whether average-case PPAD hardness can be based on standard cryptographic assumptions, such as the existence of one-way functions or public-key encryption. This question is particularly well-motivated in light of new devastating attacks on obfuscation candidates and their underlying building blocks, which are currently the only known source for average-case PPAD hardness.

Central in the study of obfuscation-based PPAD hardness is the sink-of-verifiable-line (SVL) problem, an intermediate step in constructing hard-on-average instances of the PPAD-complete problem source-or-sink. Within the framework of black-box reductions we prove the following results:

- Average-case PPAD hardness (and even average-case SVL hardness) does not imply any form of cryptographic hardness (not even one-way functions).

- Average-case SVL hardness cannot be based either on standard cryptographic assumptions or on average case PPAD hardness (and is thus not essential for PPAD hardness).

- Any attempt for basing the average-case hardness of source-or-sink on standard cryptographic assumptions must result in instances with a nearly exponential number of solutions.

Taken together, our results imply that while it may still be possible to base average-case PPAD hardness on standard cryptographic assumptions, any black-box attempt must significantly deviate from the obfuscation-based approach: It cannot go through the SVL problem, and it must result in source-or-sink instances with a nearly-exponential number of solutions.


Paper:

TR16-059 | 14th April 2016 15:43

Can PPAD Hardness be Based on Standard Cryptographic Assumptions?





TR16-059
Authors: Alon Rosen, Gil Segev, Ido Shahaf
Publication: 14th April 2016 22:44
Downloads: 357
Keywords: 


Abstract:

We consider the question of whether average-case PPAD hardness can be based on standard cryptographic assumptions, such as the existence of one-way functions or public-key encryption. This question is particularly well-motivated in light of new devastating attacks on obfuscation candidates and their underlying building blocks, which are currently the only known source for average-case PPAD hardness.

Central in the study of obfuscation-based PPAD hardness is the sink-of-verifiable-line (SVL) problem, an intermediate step in constructing hard-on-average instances of the PPAD-complete problem source-or-sink. Within the framework of black-box reductions we prove the following results:

- Average-case PPAD hardness (and even average-case SVL hardness) does not imply any form of cryptographic hardness (not even one-way functions).

- Average-case SVL hardness cannot be based either on standard cryptographic assumptions or on average case PPAD hardness (and is thus not essential for PPAD hardness).

- Any attempt for basing the average-case hardness of source-or-sink on standard cryptographic assumptions must result in instances with a nearly exponential number of solutions.

Taken together, our results imply that while it may still be possible to base average-case PPAD hardness on standard cryptographic assumptions, any black-box attempt must significantly deviate from the obfuscation-based approach: It cannot go through the SVL problem, and it must result in source-or-sink instances with a nearly-exponential number of solutions.



ISSN 1433-8092 | Imprint