Under the auspices of the Computational Complexity Foundation (CCF)

REPORTS > DETAIL:

### Revision(s):

Revision #2 to TR18-128 | 22nd April 2019 06:01

#### A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems

Revision #2
Authors: Ewin Tang
Accepted on: 22nd April 2019 06:01
Keywords:

Abstract:

We give a classical analogue to Kerenidis and Prakash's quantum recommendation system, previously believed to be one of the strongest candidates for provably exponential speedups in quantum machine learning. Our main result is an algorithm that, given an $m \times n$ matrix in a data structure supporting certain $\ell^2$-norm sampling operations, outputs an $\ell^2$-norm sample from a rank-$k$ approximation of that matrix in time $O(\text{poly}(k)\log(mn))$, only polynomially slower than the quantum algorithm. As a consequence, Kerenidis and Prakash's algorithm does not in fact give an exponential speedup over classical algorithms. Further, under strong input assumptions, the classical recommendation system resulting from our algorithm produces recommendations exponentially faster than previous classical systems, which run in time linear in $m$ and $n$.

The main insight of this work is the use of simple routines to manipulate $\ell^2$-norm sampling distributions, which play the role of quantum superpositions in the classical setting. This correspondence indicates a potentially fruitful framework for formally comparing quantum machine learning algorithms to classical machine learning algorithms.

Changes to previous version:

typos

Revision #1 to TR18-128 | 13th April 2019 12:02

#### A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems

Revision #1
Authors: Ewin Tang
Accepted on: 13th April 2019 12:02
Keywords:

Abstract:

We give a classical analogue to Kerenidis and Prakash's quantum recommendation system, previously believed to be one of the strongest candidates for provably exponential speedups in quantum machine learning. Our main result is an algorithm that, given an $m \times n$ matrix in a data structure supporting certain $\ell^2$-norm sampling operations, outputs an $\ell^2$-norm sample from a rank-$k$ approximation of that matrix in time $O(\operatorname{poly}(k)\log(mn))$, only polynomially slower than the quantum algorithm. As a consequence, Kerenidis and Prakash's algorithm does not in fact give an exponential speedup over classical algorithms. Further, under strong input assumptions, the classical recommendation system resulting from our algorithm produces recommendations exponentially faster than previous classical systems, which run in time linear in $m$ and $n$.

The main insight of this work is the use of simple routines to manipulate $\ell^2$-norm sampling distributions, which play the role of quantum superpositions in the classical setting. This correspondence indicates a potentially fruitful framework for formally comparing quantum machine learning algorithms to classical machine learning algorithms.

Changes to previous version:

modified structure of document, improved runtime, simplified algorithm and notation

### Paper:

TR18-128 | 11th July 2018 00:08

#### A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems

TR18-128
Authors: Ewin Tang
Publication: 11th July 2018 11:38
A recommendation system suggests products to users based on data about user preferences. It is typically modeled by a problem of completing an $m\times n$ matrix of small rank $k$. We give the first classical algorithm to produce a recommendation in $O(\text{poly}(k)\text{polylog}(m,n))$ time, which is an exponential improvement on previous algorithms that run in time linear in $m$ and $n$. Our strategy is inspired by a quantum algorithm by Kerenidis and Prakash: like the quantum algorithm, instead of reconstructing a user's full list of preferences, we only seek a randomized sample from the user's preferences. Our main result is an algorithm that samples high-weight entries from a low-rank approximation of the input matrix in time independent of $m$ and $n$, given natural sampling assumptions on that input matrix. As a consequence, we show that Kerenidis and Prakash's quantum machine learning (QML) algorithm, one of the strongest candidates for provably exponential speedups in QML, does not in fact give an exponential speedup over classical algorithms.